Engagement model
A dedicated team is the right model when you need software built but have nobody inside to run the build. You get engineers, a lead who owns delivery, and a weekly reporting rhythm, without hiring a permanent department for a project with an end date.
A 30-minute call to establish what exists today, what has to be true at the end, and what the real deadline is. No proposal is written before this.
You receive three to five profiles with the specific experience the work needs, their rates, and their availability. You interview whoever you want.
Most engagements start with a short paid trial on a real task. You pay nothing until you decide to hire, and nothing at all if the trial does not convince you.
One person owns the outcome and reports weekly against what was agreed. Scope changes are priced before they are built, not after.
When this is the wrong choice
If you already have a strong engineering lead with capacity, staff augmentation costs less and gives you the same output.
Tell us what you are trying to ship. You get a matched shortlist in 48 hours and pay $0 until you hire.
Three to six people. Beyond that, coordination cost grows faster than output, and the honest advice is usually to split the work rather than the team.
You do. The lead owns delivery against it, and pushes back when a request would break something you care about.
Yes, and we plan for it: documentation and handover are part of the engagement rather than an extra you negotiate at the end.
Roles we place for this
Vetted engineers, matched in 48 hours. No recruitment fees, no payment until you hire.
🇸🇬 Trusted by companies across Singapore